A new libseccomp releases (v2.5.6 and v2.6.0) were cut last month.
Theoretically, we could use v2.6.0 but let's stay conservative for now.
Signed-off-by: Kir Kolyshkin <kolyshkin@gmail.com>
We need these to match the Makefile detection of the right gcc for
runc-dmz, as well as making sure that everything builds properly for our
cross-i386 tests. While we're at it, add x86 to the list of build
targets for release builds (presumably nobody will use it, but since we
do test builds of this anyway it probably won't hurt).
In addition, clean up the handling of the native architecture build by
treating it the same as any other build (ensuring that building runc
from a different platform will work the same way regardless of the
native architecture). In practice, the build works the same way as
before.
Signed-off-by: Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@cyphar.com>
It was released about a month ago. I don't see anything major
in the changelog but it makes sense to keep tracking upstream deps.
Signed-off-by: Kir Kolyshkin <kolyshkin@gmail.com>
My GPG keys are not available inside the container, so it makes little
sense to try to sign the binaries inside the container's release.sh. The
solution is to split things into separate build and sign stages, with
signing ocurring after the in-Docker build.
Signed-off-by: Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@cyphar.com>
