# Always Online: STUN servers ![GitHub commit activity](https://img.shields.io/github/commit-activity/w/pradt2/always-online-stun?style=for-the-badge) ![GitHub last commit](https://img.shields.io/github/last-commit/pradt2/always-online-stun?style=for-the-badge) ![GitHub](https://img.shields.io/github/license/pradt2/always-online-stun?style=for-the-badge) Have you ever thought: *Gosh, why isn't there a regularly updated, comprehensive list of publicly available STUN servers*? **Well, this is it. A list of online STUN servers, refreshed hourly.** ## How to use Hardcode this link [valid_hosts.txt](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/pradt2/always-online-stun/master/valid_hosts.txt) into your application, and use it anytime you need a fresh list of online STUN servers. Or, if you don't want to rely on DNS resolution, use [valid_ipv4s.txt](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/pradt2/always-online-stun/master/valid_ipv4s.txt) for IPv4, and [valid_ipv6s.txt](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/pradt2/always-online-stun/master/valid_ipv6s.txt) for IPv6 addresses. ### JS example with Geolocation ```javascript const GEO_LOC_URL = "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/pradt2/always-online-stun/master/geoip_cache.txt"; const IPV4_URL = "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/pradt2/always-online-stun/master/valid_ipv4s.txt"; const GEO_USER_URL = "https://geolocation-db.com/json/"; const geoLocs = await(await fetch(GEO_LOC_URL)).json(); const { latitude, longitude } = await(await fetch(GEO_USER_URL)).json(); const closestAddr = (await(await fetch(IPV4_URL)).text()).trim().split('\n') .map(addr => { const [stunLat, stunLon] = geoLocs[addr.split(':')[0]]; const dist = ((latitude - stunLat) ** 2 + (longitude - stunLon) ** 2 ) ** .5; return [addr, dist]; }).reduce(([addrA, distA], [addrB, distB]) => distA <= distB ? [addrA, distA] : [addrB, distB])[0]; console.log(closestAddr); // prints the IP:PORT of the closest STUN server ``` ## FAQ ### But hard-coding of links is baaaad?! Well, not exactly. Hard-coding of links which were never meant to be hard-coded is bad. Here the situation is different. Since I recommend that users hard-code the links to the few specific files, I'll avoid doing anything that would make the link invalid (e.g. I won't change the name of the file, name of the repository, my Github username, etc.). ### But I still don't feel comfortable hard-coding any links... Feel free to open an issue and let's discuss your specific needs. ### How often are the lists refreshed? Hourly, you can see the timestamp of the last check in the commit message. ### What RFC specs do the servers conform to? The `valid_nat_testing_*` lists contain servers that should be capable of both NAT detection and behaviour testing. These capabilities roughly correspond to RFC5780 (and, implicitly, to RFC5389). To qualify for these lists, a server has to correctly respond to a RFC5389 `BINDING` request and provide the `OTHER-ADDRESS` attribute in the response. The presence of the `OTHER-ADDRESS` attribute is the spec-compliant way to advertise that a STUN server can be used for NAT behaviour tests. _At the moment, no actual verification of the NAT behaviour testing capabilities is carried out. We rely on the STUN server maintainers to set the `OTHER-ADDRESS` attribute only if their server supports NAT behaviour testing. If that's a problem for you (i.e. you need a stronger guarantee), please open an issue._ The other `valid_*` lists contain servers that are capable of NAT detection only. These are much bigger lists as only a small fraction of servers is configured to provide the full NAT testing capabilities. To qualify for these lists, a server has to correctly respond to a RFC5389 `BINDING` request. ### What IP versions and transport protocols are tested? IP versions 4 and 6. UDP and TCP. ### I noticed that the lists are shuffled on each check. Why? Lazy/inconsiderate devs will tend to just grab the top-most link from the list (and TBF, can we blame them?). By shuffling the list, I ensure that we don't end up spamming the same host forever. ### What servers are checked, and how can I add more publicly available servers? The list is in `candidates.txt`. Feel free to create a PR adding more servers, or just open an issue and list them there. ### My server is on your list, and I don't like it. What can I do? Open an issue, and it will be removed from the automated checks within 24 hours.